Metascience Reading List
13 great papers and 7 essential ones
Essential papers are in bold.
What is wrong
Simmons, Joseph P., Leif D. Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn. 2011. “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant.” Psychological Science 22 (11): 1359–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.
Gelman, Andrew, and Eric Loken. "The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time." Department of Statistics, Columbia University 348, no. 1-17 (2013): 3.
Silberzahn, R., E. L. Uhlmann, D. P. Martin, P. Anselmi, F. Aust, E. Awtrey, Bahník, et al. 2018. “Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results.” 1 (3): 337–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646.
Prevalence
Ioannidis, John P.A. 2005. “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” In Getting to Good: Research Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences, 2–8. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
Manrai, Arjun K., Gaurav Bhatia, Judith Strymish, Isaac S. Kohane, and Sachin H. Jain. 2014. “Medicine’s Uncomfortable Relationship With Math: Calculating Positive Predictive Value.” JAMA Internal Medicine 174 (6): 991. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMAINTERNMED.2014.1059.
Aarts, Alexander A., Joanna E. Anderson, Christopher J. Anderson, Peter R. Attridge, Angela Attwood, Jordan Axt, Molly Babel, et al. 2015. “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science 349 (6251). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
Baker, Monya. 2016. “1,500 Scientists Lift the Lid on Reproducibility.” Nature 533 (7604): 452–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a.
Errington, Timothy M., Maya Mathur, Courtney K. Soderberg, Alexandria Denis, Nicole Perfito, Elizabeth Iorns, and Brian A. Nosek. 2021. “Investigating the Replicability of Preclinical Cancer Biology.” ELife 10 (December). https://doi.org/10.7554/ELIFE.71601.
Carlisle, J. B. 2021. “False Individual Patient Data and Zombie Randomised Controlled Trials Submitted to Anaesthesia.” Anaesthesia 76 (4): 472–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/ANAE.15263.
Solutions
Simonsohn, Uri, Leif D. Nelson, and Joseph P. Simmons. 2014. “P-Curve: A Key to the File-Drawer.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 143 (2): 534–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0033242.
Steegen, Sara, Francis Tuerlinckx, Andrew Gelman, and Wolf Vanpaemel. 2016. “Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (5): 702–12. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1745691616658637.
Leek, Jeff, Blakeley B. McShane, Andrew Gelman, David Colquhoun, Michèle B. Nuijten, and Steven N. Goodman. 2017. “Five Ways to Fix Statistics.” Nature 2021 551:7682 551 (7682): 557–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-017-07522-z.
Chambers, Christopher D., and Loukia Tzavella. 2021. “The Past, Present and Future of Registered Reports.” Nature Human Behaviour 2021 6:1 6 (1): 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01193-7.
Simonsohn, Uri, Joseph P. Simmons, and Leif D. Nelson. 2020. “Specification Curve Analysis.” Nature Human Behaviour 2020 4:11 4 (11): 1208–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z.
Lakens, Daniël. 2020. “Pandemic Researchers - Recruit Your Own Best Critics.” Nature 581 (7807): 121. https://doi.org/10.1038/D41586-020-01392-8.
Pre-2005
Langmuir, Irving. 1953. “Pathological Science.” 32 (5): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1989.11670607.
Platt, John R. 1964. “Strong Inference.” Science Science 146 (3642): 347–53. https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~markhill/science64_strong_inference.pdf.
Cohen, Jacob. 1994. “The Earth Is Round (p < .05).” American Psychologist 49 (12): 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997.
History
Gelman, Andrew. "What has happened down here is the winds have changed." Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science (2016). https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2016/09/21/what-has-happened-down-here-is-the-winds-have-changed/.
Ioannidis, John P. A. 2024. “What Meta-Research Has Taught Us about Research and Changes to Research Practices.” Journal of Economic Surveys, October. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOES.12666.

Not a paper, but I've recently been wondering why 'The Structure of Scientific Revolutions' by Thomas Kuhn doesn't enter into these sorts of discussions. It seems to me that his description of 'normal science', and what is necessary to challenge a paradigm, offers.a lot of insight into problems in science, and especially into the persistence of string theory.